logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2018.05.31 2018고단89
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing car.

On March 15, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.071% from blood at around 03:50 on March 15, 2018, and continued to proceed directly from the intersection to the lower parallel.

Since there was an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care for a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle to drive the motor vehicle safely according to the signal or instruction indicating the traffic safety facilities.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was negligent in proceeding with the red flab, and was negligent in driving the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the driver’s seat in the Defendant’s vehicle operation, resulting in the victim D(16) unregistered and CBR 124C c. 124c.

In conclusion, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence that caused injury to the victim D, such as 'a 12-day therapy', 'a flador flador flador flador', and 'a flador flador flador flador flador flador', 'a flador flador flador flador flador'

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement hearing report with D;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, on-site photographs of the accident, and on-site survey reports;

1. Notification of the results of crackdown on drinking, statement of the situation of the driver driving, and inquiry about the results of crackdown on drinking;

1. Photographs by cutting down CCTV images for the control of illegal spirits;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Article 40 and 50 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents) are against victims D with heavy crimes.

arrow