The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Whether a pleading is combined or closed, or whether a closed pleading is resumed belongs to the court's discretion, and the court below did not combine the case with another case against the defendant.

The defendant's application for resumption of oral argument for consolidation after the closing of oral argument cannot be deemed unlawful.

In addition, the argument that this case may be tried concurrently with other cases is not a legitimate ground for appeal under Article 383 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing

In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.