beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On August 1, 2015, the Defendant visited 22:43 of the former Kakao Stockholm where 188 members of the former Kakao Stockholm had access to the former Kakao Stockholm room, and sent to the victim B a written answer stating, “I would notify you that I would take the special measures of the latter if I would not recognize you’s imprue accounting and you would not have any mistake of you would receive any money from the members by driving ahead of the former Kakao Kao Kao Stockholm, without the consent of the members.”
However, the above victim did not receive a complaint by taking out money from the members of the previous natural forces or by abusing his name without the consent of the members in the case of his personal action.
Accordingly, the Defendant, with a view to slandering the people, thereby impairing the honor of others by divulging public false information via information and communications networks.
2. On August 6, 2015, the Defendant visited 188 members of an organization Kakao Stockholm, who were members of the former natural unit, at a non-permanent place, and transmitted the statement to the victim as stated in paragraph (1) of this Article, stating that “at least 500 million won per day of the former Kakao Professor, who received 188 members of the organization, received money from many people, and the preparation of the document constitutes a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act, is the head of the household, but the head of the household is not the mother. However, it is the order of the Defendant to treat the civil petition from those who suffered damage from Ha, who suffered damage from Ha, to whom Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
However, there was no fact that the victim received money in return for the victim's demonstration and received money.
Accordingly, the Defendant, with a view to slandering the people, thereby impairing the honor of others by divulging public false information via information and communications networks.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;