A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 23, 2017, at around 10:57, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (re-accidents after accidents) driving a Crocketing motor vehicle with the revocation of the driver’s license of the motor vehicle, and changing the road of five lanes in the direction of two parallels in the direction of two parallels in the shooting distance range of the new hospital in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to take into account the automobile driving situation of the changed lane and to accurately manipulate the operation and steering gear so as to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and changed the course from five lanes to four lanes, and received the center of the left part of the F Poter Cargo Vehicle driven by the victim E, on the right side of the said F Poter passenger vehicle.

Although Defendant 1 received the cargo truck as above and destroyed the 1,515,060 won of the repair cost for the cargo truck, Defendant 1 immediately stopped and escaped without taking measures to eliminate the danger and obstacle to road traffic.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) committed an act of neglecting his/her duty at the time of the front of the new hospital, while continuing to proceed to the intersection of the distance from the shooting range of the new hospital in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City to the direction of the two parallels in the direction of the extension. The Defendant received the center of the left-hand part of the H dump truck driven driven by the victim G, who moved to the direction of the two parallels of the extension from the surface of the sexual hospital located at the time of the said intersection.

The Defendant: (a) due to such occupational negligence, inflicted an injury on the victim G, such as catum fat, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim I who was accompanied by the rocketing car; (b) the victim I, who was accompanied by the victim I, was at the bottom of a frame necessary for approximately six weeks of treatment; and (c) the victim J, who suffered an injury to the catum that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

3...