The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months) of the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant led to confession of the facts charged in the instant case and reflects his mistake, there are family members to support the Defendant, and the detention of the Defendant appears to have been accompanied by difficult circumstances, and the degree of assault against the instant crime appears to have been relatively minor, and the Defendant also deposited KRW 500,000 for the police officers, who are the other party to the instant crime.

However, the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties requires strict punishment as a crime prejudicial to the function of the State by nullifying a legitimate exercise of public authority; the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of suspension of execution despite the fact that the defendant had been punished several times as the same crime; and considering the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as circumstances before and after the crime, and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines established by the Supreme Court sentencing guidelines established by the Sentencing Commission, the court below's punishment against the defendant is too appropriate and too unreasonable. Thus,

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.