logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.03.28 2016고단4582
장물취득등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Attached Form

The Automobile Management Act is in violation of the Automobile Management Act of Nos. 1 to 4 of the crime sight table 2.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, “2016 Highest 4582”, the Defendant purchased a siren vehicle from those who rent a vehicle in a short term at a used vehicle transaction site by B and C, and had mind to sell it to others for profit.

1. On July 7, 2016, the Defendant acquired stolens over five occasions from that time to that time during the same month, with knowledge of the fact that it is a stolen of EA7 car owned by the Victim D (State) at a place unclaimed, including purchasing KRW 10 million and acquiring stolens.

2. On July 13, 2016, around 13:00, the Defendant sold and transferred stolens to F and G the E-A7 car, which is the stolen acquired as set forth in the foregoing paragraph 1, at KRW 21 million. From that time, the Defendant transferred stolens to F and G five times from that time until the 19th day of the same month, as described in attached Table 1.

3. In case where a transferee of an automobile violating the Automobile Management Act intends to transfer it again to a third person, the transfer registration shall be made in his name before it is transferred; and

Nevertheless, on July 7, 2016, the Defendant purchased an EA7 car from C and B and did not register the transfer of ownership. On the same day, F and G transfer the said vehicle to F and G in the name of the Defendant without registering the transfer of ownership. From that time to that time, the Defendant did not register the transfer of the said vehicle in the name of the Defendant and transferred it to a third party more than five times as shown in attached Table 1, from that time until the 19th day of the same month.

"2017 Highest 35"

1. On February 9, 2016, the Defendant acquiring stolens extended approximately KRW 2.5 million to I, while taking over the stolens as collateral, even though he/she knew of the fact that his/her vehicle was a stolen for the victim’s KSW 640D, Co., Ltd., Ltd., which he/she embezzled from I in front of Daejeon U.S. H., the Defendant borrowed approximately KRW 2.5 million to I.

arrow