1. The Defendant’s decision on recommendations for performance in Seoul East Eastern District Court 2008Gaso351528 was made.

On September 23, 2010, the Japanese Savings Bank (hereinafter “Seoul Mutual Savings Bank”) filed a lawsuit against the plaintiffs on April 29, 2004 against the plaintiffs. Based on the loan extended to the plaintiffs, Seoul Eastern District Court 2008 Ghana351528, the above court held on December 4, 2008 that “the plaintiffs jointly and severally agreed to pay 4,226,581 won to the Jeju Savings Bank and the amount calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from the day following the last delivery of a copy of a complaint to the day of complete payment (hereinafter “the instant order of execution”) to the effect that the decision of performance recommendation was delivered to the plaintiffs on December 17, 2008, and that if the decision of performance recommendation of this case became final and conclusive on January 1, 2009, the Seoul Central District Court 203Ha Daegu District Court 208, which included the plaintiff No. 2083, Jun. 26, 2017.

According to the above facts, loans against the plaintiffs of the Il Savings Bank, which was the cause of the claim for the decision of execution recommendation of this case, constitute bankruptcy claims prior to the declaration of bankruptcy against the plaintiffs, and thus, the immunity decision becomes final and conclusive, and thus, all obligations are exempted pursuant to the main sentence of Article 566 of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act.

Therefore, the defendant's claim against the plaintiffs based on the decision of execution recommendation of this case shall have ordinary claims.