logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2014.09.24 2014고단1273
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Damage of property and interference with the business of the Defendant at around 03:20 on June 27, 2014, at the main point of “D” operated by the victim C in Busan Shipping Daegu, Busan, the Defendant: (a) laid off 5 large-scale fire parts in which the market price on the victim’s possession in the above main point is unknown without any reason under the influence of alcohol; (b) laid off the entrance door No. 3 of the above main point in the main place; and (c) laid off 50 persons in the market price and 17 (17) monitors and 270,000 won in each repair cost.

The defendant reported the above facts to the victim 112 and returned to the police officer's dispatch to the above main points, and on the ground that the victim reported the above facts to the police officer, the victim "Seakia" from the above date to 04:10 on the same day.

Reports to Police

n.e.b. Bail;

2. On June 27, 2014, the lower court erred by misapprehending the duty to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender on the ground that: (a) the instant police officer attempted to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender on the ground that: (b) the instant police officer, at around 04:20 on June 27, 2014; (c) the instant police officer’s slopeF and slope G, who was in custody at the entrance of the 2studio room, was 30 bottled on the ground that the market price on the victim’s possession could not be known; and (d) the customers, who were in the said main room, were frighted on the floor; (d) the Defendant damaged the property owned by the victim; and (e) interfered with the victim’s bar business by force.

b) evidence;

A brine frine, frine, of a bitch, is frine, and frine is frine on the face of the F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to C and F

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow