The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Reasons for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles merely supervise the worship separately from the victim, and thus, the defendant's act does not interfere with the worship, and even if it is not so, it constitutes a legitimate act or self-help to normalize the church.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing is heavy.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly examined and adopted by the court below on the assertion of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles, it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant interfered with the defendant's towing of the victim by citing the supporting leave on two occasions and reading the sexual scams, etc., and such obstruction of the defendant's towing of the worship does not constitute a legitimate act or self-help.

B. Considering the various sentencing conditions stated in the records on the assertion of unfair sentencing, the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed as heavy.

3. Conclusion, Defendant’s appeal cannot be accepted.