logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2014.08.20 2012가합495
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the lawsuits against the Plaintiff’s central construction, the following two-A.

Part other than the money mentioned in paragraph (1).

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of the parties concerned) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s ground A apartment on the ground B of Chuncheon City (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(2) For the management of 297 households, an autonomous management organization consisting of occupants is the business entity that newly built and sold the instant apartment complex. Defendant Central Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Central Construction”) is the contractor that newly built and sold the instant apartment complex. Defendant Central Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Central Construction”) is the construction contractor of the instant apartment complex, and Defendant Korea Housing Guarantee Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Housing Guarantee Co., Ltd.”) is the company that entered into a warranty contract with Defendant Central Construction Co., Ltd. for the instant apartment complex.

B. On June 29, 2007, the Defendant’s housing guarantee contract is concluded and usage inspection 1) The Defendant’s housing guarantee contract with the Defendant’s central construction as the guaranty creditor as the Chuncheon market (hereinafter “instant guarantee contract”).

(1) The Plaintiff newly constructed an apartment unit on July 20, 2007 to July 20, 2009 and issued a warranty as shown below [Attachment 1]. [Attachment 1] The Plaintiff completed the construction of the instant autonomous management body on July 20, 2007 from July 20, 2008 to July 196, 528,092 from July 20, 2007 to July 30, 2007 to July 29, 2009 to July 20, 200 to July 19, 2007 to July 20, 2007 to July 19, 2010 to the effect that the Plaintiff was granted approval for the use of the instant apartment unit on July 20, 2007 to July 20 to July 19, 2010.

C. Assignment and notification of damage claim in lieu of defect repair 1) The plaintiff among the 297 households of the sectional owners of the apartment of this case, stating "untransferable household defect repair cost" as attached Form 1 (attached Form 25 households).

1. Of the descriptions of “untransferable cost for repairing defects”, 10.202/805/80, 12.202/1102, 204/1105/205/200, 204/1105/300.

arrow