The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for ten months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendant led to the confession of and against the instant crime, and that the amount of damage caused by each of the instant larceny was not so significant, and that some victims (the victims of the instant theft case) have recovered from and agreed to recover from damage.

B. However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed a continuous and repeated crime against multiple victims for a considerable period of time; (b) committed a theft of cash, etc. by destroying or destroying the entrance by opening the door or destroying the door, which is bad in the nature of the crime; (c) committed the instant crime even after having been issued a disposition of juvenile protective disposition and suspension of indictment twice for the same type of crime; (d) did not agree with the victims of the instant case; and (e) did not agree with the victims of the instant case; and (e) other various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing specified in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, details of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., even if considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendant

C. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.