Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] On January 25, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon Flag Flag, and one million won as a fine in the same court on July 17, 2009.
[Criminal Facts] On July 18, 2017, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle B, under the influence of alcohol level of 0.114% from the blood alcohol level of around 23:26 on July 18, 2017, with B low-speed car from the influence area below the Suwon-si Ships to the left distance of the same Gu.
Accordingly, the defendant had been driving a drinking twice again, even though he had been driving a drinking again.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Written appraisal of alcohol and notification of the results of the crackdown on drinking driving;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;
1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The consideration of favorable circumstances among the grounds for sentencing);
1. Suspension of execution under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act - The circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act - The defendant has the record of having been punished several times for the same kind of crime. The favorable circumstances - the defendant recognizes all the criminal facts. - The defendant has no record of having been sentenced to a fine exceeding the fine until now. - The defendant must take into account that approximately eight years have elapsed since the defendant was punished for the same crime. The sentence as the order is given in consideration of all the conditions of the sentencing