logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.23 2015고정4367
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who owns a BP car and is engaged in driving service.

1. Around June 29, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act: (a) around 19:05, the Defendant driven the said car at the intersection of the Seoul Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul Metropolitan Government Working on the air-line 78-line engine, thereby driving the said car in the direction of a new flood distance from the upstream

Since there is a place where traffic is controlled by signal, etc., a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and caused the passengers on board the bus to go beyond the upper part of the D urban bus driving by Hansung Co., Ltd., a corporation, who was directly engaged in under the new name from the right side of the route to the left side of the route to conflict with the upper part of the above vehicle's right side.

Defendant 1 caused the victim E, who was on board the bus due to the above occupational negligence, to receive approximately three-day medical treatment on the left-hand part of the bus, such as a string box, etc., and the victim F, to receive approximately three-day medical treatment, and the salt pans and tensions in the alley part, etc., and at the same time, Defendant 1 damaged the victim’s property that needs to be repaired in an amount equivalent to KRW 425,00,000 for the exchange of the above bus spread with the victim’s Han-sung Transportation.

2. He/she shall not operate any motor vehicle on a road which has not been covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation;

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the car without mandatory insurance at the same time and place as the above Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident in E, C and G preparation;

1. Mandatory insurance, each written diagnosis, and written estimate 1.

arrow