The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a fine of 4 million won) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The defendant, by recognizing the crime of this case, has shown not only cooperation in the investigation but also his attitude to repent of his mistake.

The defendant does not have the same criminal record as the crime of this case.

It seems that the economic situation of the defendant is not good.

However, the amount of the secured claim on the instant vehicle by the victim reaches approximately KRW 2.7.6 million, and the amount of damage caused by the instant crime is not so significant.

The victim is still trying to punish the defendant.

The accused shall have the past record of criminal punishment for a period of five times.

In addition, even if the defendant's age, career, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, social relation, motive and circumstance of the crime, method and consequence of the crime, etc. are added to all the sentencing factors indicated in the records and arguments, there is no new circumstance to deem that the sentencing conditions of the court below against the defendant have been changed in the first instance court, and it is not determined that the sentencing of the court below is too unfair because it exceeds the reasonable discretion.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.