The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The court below rendered a judgment dismissing the prosecutor's request regarding the part of the defendant's case against which the defendant was convicted and the part of the case for which the attachment order was requested, and since only the defendant appealeds against this, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the part of the defendant's case for which the defendant was convicted (the case for the attachment order under Article 9 (8) of the Act on Probation and Electronic Monitoring, Etc. of Specific Criminal Offenders is considered to have been appealed, but only the defendant appealed, there is no interest in reviewing and determining the case for the attachment order, and there is no reason for ex officio judgment that differs from the conclusion).

3. Examining the various sentencing conditions in the instant case, even though the Defendant argued to the effect that he denies the crime at the investigative agency and the lower court, it appears that all the instant crimes were committed at the time of the first instance, and the Defendant shows the appearance of realizing and reflecting his wrongness, having no record of sexual crimes of the same kind, having no record of criminal punishment for the past 20 years, and having no record of criminal punishment for the past 70 years, and having been suffering from acute cardio-highness disorder due to the age of 70 years old, and there are no conditions favorable to the Defendant, such as the possibility of recidivism in the future.

However, the instant crime was committed by the Defendant’s act of having the victimized children, who are private teaching institutes, dance or lock his own view with the fact that the Defendant was a driver of the knife of the knife of the knife of the knife of the knife of the knife of the knife of the knife of the knife, thereby making the knife of the knife, and making the knife of the knife more k