All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts 1) As long as Defendant A purchased land in the name of Defendant A without undergoing lawful procedures, such as a clan general meeting, inasmuch as Defendant A purchased land using compensation in the name of Defendant A without undergoing due process, the lower court erred by misapprehending the fact and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment. 2) According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, such as Defendant B’s statement in the investigative agency of the Defendants B, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentence (six months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution) against Defendant A on the grounds that it is too uneasible and unfair.

2. Determination

A. Based on its stated reasoning, the lower court rendered a judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts against the Defendants on the following grounds: (a) the embezzlement among the facts charged in the instant case against Defendant A and the facts charged in the instant case against Defendant B (including the forgery of private documents, the uttering of a falsified investigation document, the use of public electronic records, and the exercise of false entry and electronic records) constituted a case where there is no proof of crime; and (b) upon examining the relevant evidence in light of the records, the lower court’s determination is just and acceptable; and (c) there is no

Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.

B. As Defendant A’s judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing was caused to each of the instant crimes in the course of performing duties as the president of a clan, there are circumstances to consider the circumstances. Defendant A is the primary offender; Defendant A is the primary offender; Defendant A is the age of 75 years old; and other Defendant A’s age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the crime.