beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant came to know of the false name (title D), which is a general responsibility for telephone finance fraud, through the introduction of the “C” from the Chinese War in early 2015 to the Chinese War. On August 2015, 2015, the Defendant got a cellphone from a person who was not deceased in the name of the first policeman.
The namelightist shared the role of allowing the victim to call the phone to the victim and send the victim to the net (electronic currency) sales box, and the defendant, as if he/she purchases the electronic currency normally by posting the phone to E and F, share the role of transferring the money to the namelight net trading account.
On August 6, 2015, a person who is infinite may call to the injured party G by calls from the injured party G on August 6, 2015, and "to provide a loan" while misrepresenting himself/herself.
A false statement was made in writing as "..... to send money for notarial expenses".
Accordingly, on August 6, 2015, the victim transferred 200,000,000 won to the National Bank Account (J) in F name around August 11, 2015, in the name of SC bank account (I) in the name of E, an account known by the winners of the name in light of the deceased on August 6, 2015.
On August 6, 2015, the Defendant would purchase electronic currency by posting a phone to E on the sales telephone using the above large phone at the scopon on August 6, 2015.
The electronic currency of USD 1,603 has been transferred from E to E with the name submeral net account of the submers, “........”
On August 11, 2015, the Defendant continued to call a net sales net F on the store, and received from F the electronic currency of USD 5,000 from F to the net net account in the same way.
Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with a name-free person, deceiving the victim, thereby deceiving 8 million won.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;
1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;
1. Statement of the police statement related to G;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on copies of complaints filed in E;
1. Criminal facts;