A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who has worked as a regular manager at D Co., Ltd., Ltd., a victimized company located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongbuk-gun, from September 2001 to July 2015.

A damaged company is a company that manufactures and sells various films, such as liquid information films, installed in smartphones, and the defendant is engaged in the sales of goods, business, and collection of the price by supplying goods to the trading company while in office in the damaged company.

The Defendant, while carrying out the above duties in the victimized Company, shall deliver goods in line with the order received from the Customer, and if the Defendant determines important matters for the operation of the Company, such as determining the price of the goods sold or supplying goods more than the order quantity of the Customer, he/she shall obtain approval or approval from E, the representative director of the victimized Company, from July 2013 to October 2013. However, in the victimized Company’s office, without obtaining any approval or approval from the said E, in violation of the above duties, and without obtaining any approval or approval from the said E, in order to promote the interests of AFC (State), F, G, etc., which are some customers of the victimized Company, such as the list of crimes, at will, in order to arbitrarily provide the damaged Company with goods more than KRW 450,00,000,000,000, compared to the payment made by the customer.

As a result, the Defendant obtained approximately KRW 450 million from some customers of the victimized company, and suffered damages equivalent to the same amount from the victimized company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police and prosecutor with regard to E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 356 and 355 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of criminal facts;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following favorable circumstances) is that the Defendant arbitrarily supplied goods to the customer of the victimized company, thereby causing damage to the property equivalent to KRW 450 million.