(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.02.12 2019구단19245

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.02.12 2019구단19245

난민불인정결정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 9, 2017, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with visa exemption (B-1) status on July 9, 2017, and applied for refugee recognition to the Defendant on September 19, 2017.

B. On May 28, 2018, the Defendant rendered a decision to recognize refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would be subject to persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

C. As to this, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on July 6, 2018, but the objection was dismissed on July 30, 2019.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was the Plaintiff’s original slick, but did not properly observe the norms to be implemented as a slick, such as the normal slickness and gold.

However, after the plaintiff's father's death, the residents of the lack of native villages forced the plaintiff who left the native village and resided in other areas to walk out the telephone and spath, and to implement the rules of spathic as a spathic.

In addition, the plaintiff, who returned to the native village, was locked among the residents of the lack of self-sufficiency between the Abagic city, contacts with the plaintiff's bridge in order to shoulder the plaintiff, and the plaintiff saw his image.

After that, the plaintiff became a person without a opinion and became a person with no opinion and became a person with no opinion of high-speed villages, and the threat that the plaintiff had been raised from the previous ones has become more serious.

In addition, some of the plaintiff's family members, including the plaintiff's punishment, have also threatened the plaintiff for the same reasons as the plaintiff's high-speed village residents.

Therefore, if the plaintiff returns home to Morocco, he would be able to do so as above.

유사 판례

-서울행정법원 2020.02.12 2019구단19245

-서울행정법원 2018.08.31 2018구단11558

-서울행정법원 2018.09.19 2018구단60215

-서울행정법원 2017.12.15 2017구단74972

-서울행정법원 2018.10.31 2018구단62785