1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

1. Even if the defendant cited the judgment of the court of first instance fully examines the evidence newly submitted by the court of first instance, the reasons why this court should explain concerning this case are the same as the part of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following additional portions determined, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. Additional matters to be determined;

A. A building newly built on the ground of each of the instant lands, which is a land subject to the Plaintiff’s claim seeking unjust enrichment, is not a building owned by the Defendant, which is not a building owned by the Defendant.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is improper.

B. Determination is based on the results of the inquiry reply to the head of the Jeonju District Court of the first instance on the fact that the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the future on May 20, 2015, on the 90 square meters of a single-story house of the 50 square meters in light of the W and E’s ground among each of the instant lands.

However, both the above and the above building and the building “16.5 square meters in storage of the light steel frame sand plate roof” are buildings where H and I received a favorable judgment against the Defendant by seeking removal of the building against the former owner of each of the instant land.

(A) No. 1, Jeonju District Court Decision 2010Kadan2938, May 1, 201, each of the above buildings asserted by the Defendant is a building that is different from the building for which the Plaintiff seeks unjust enrichment against the Defendant.

Ultimately, the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the decision of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.