logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.02.06 2014가합8275
임료
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 44,00,00 for Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 105,60,000 for Plaintiff B; and (c) each of them, from January 20, 2015 to February 20, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 14, 201, Plaintiff A entered into a lease agreement between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant: (a) around 14, 201, the monthly rent of KRW 2,200,00 (including value-added tax, and payment on the last day of each month) for the first floor 26 stores underground of the Daegu Suwon-gu C building; and (b) the lease period was five years from the date of business commencement; (c) around November 14, 201, Plaintiff B leased the said stores to the Defendant; (d) around November 14, 201, KRW 35,000 for the lease deposit for the first floor 27 of the above C building; (e) KRW 2,25,00 for the monthly rent (including value-added tax; and (e) KRW 45,00 for the lease deposit for the first floor 28 units of the above C building; and (e) KRW 30,000 for the lease deposit for the lease deposit for 45,000,00 for the last day of each month.

B. The Defendant did not pay the Plaintiffs the monthly rent arrears and the period of the Plaintiffs’ claim to pay the rent for each of the above stores after April 2013, and the Plaintiffs sought the payment of the rent by December 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 2-1 to 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff A the sum of KRW 44,00,000 (2,200,000 x 20 months x 20 months) and the Plaintiff B the sum of rent from April 2013 to December 2014 105,60,000 [45,10,000 won (2,25,0000 x 20 months) x 20 months) 60,500,000 won (3,025,000 x 20 months) x 20 months x 20 months x 20 months x 20 months x 20 months x 20 months from the date of delivery of a copy of the correction of the grounds of claim of this case and the damages for delay from January 20, 2015 to December 25, 2015.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims are justified and all of them are accepted. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow