1. The defendant shall pay 40,103,057 won to the plaintiff and 20% per annum from December 1, 2007 to the day of complete payment.

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 4, the defendant prepared and delivered to the plaintiff on February 17, 2004 a certificate of borrowing that "the defendant borrowed 5,00,000 won from the plaintiff on December 31, 2006." The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant for the return of the above loan under the court's 200Da1588, and on April 13, 2007, "the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff 5,00,000 won and the balance thereof 】 50% per annum from January 1, 2007 to January 26, 207 】 208, 300 won per annum, 500 won per annum from the next day to 3050, 500 won per annum, 209 x 509, 209, 309, 207.

On the other hand, the lawsuit of this case filed by the Plaintiff for the extension of extinctive prescription of the claim established by the above final judgment has interests as a re-litigation for the interruption of prescription

I would like to say.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition by admitting it.