The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months) that the court below sentenced against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below does not have the same criminal power for the defendant, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case under the instruction of co-defendant A of the court below. However, these circumstances seems to have been considered in the court below, and there is no change in circumstances in the trial. Meanwhile, each of the crimes of this case is used at will by the defendant in collusion with the above Gap, etc., who was the president of the branch office of the court below in the position of the F organization Ycheon-si branch office of the above branch office, in collusion with the above Gap, who was the president of the above branch office of the court below, in order to use at will the subsidy for welfare projects for the elderly who kept in business after receiving the above branch office from the above branch office of the court below, and the crime is not less than the nature of the crime in light of the crime period and the amount of embezzlement, damage caused by the embezzlement of the subsidy against local government like each of the crimes of this case is highly likely to be criticized in that they eventually return to the residents.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.