The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant: (a) around 17:00 on September 21, 201, at a cafeteria of Asan City, the victim D (the 30-year age) operating a mobile phone store was sentenced to a fine on the wind that he/she reported his/her children to the police as fraud; (b) calls the victim D’s mobile phone using the general telephone of the above restaurant to the police; and (c) can be resolved to the extent that he/she would have a me to go off by her cell phone; (d) by her opening this gate by law; and (e) “I am, I am, I am, I am,” and “I am, I am. I am. I am, I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am am.”

the Republic of Korea 198

Shebol flab walk

Habk walk walk walk walk walk walk walk walb

Shebing dumnasium usus

년. 눈구녕을 부러뜨려 남의 신분증 안 보고 팔아 쳐먹어 이 개잡년아!!

Lbaba walk, which can be filled up for a long time, this dog walk

Rolling Shebage

(h) Hepon Doz.;

"The victim threatened each victim".

2. Determination

A. In the crime of intimidation, the term "Intimidation" means a threat of harm that may generally cause fear to an ordinary person. As such, the subjective constituent elements of the crime do not require an actor's awareness of and citing that the perpetrator informss such harm to such an extent that it actually realizes the harm that he/she notified. However, if the perpetrator's speech or behavior is merely an expression of a simple emotional desire or temporary decentralization and it is objectively evident that the perpetrator has no intent to harm in light of the surrounding circumstances, it cannot be acknowledged that the perpetrator's act of intimidation or temporary decentralization has no intent to harm. Whether there was a intent of intimidation or temporary decentralization is not only an appearance of the act but also an appearance of the act.