The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 1, 2012, the Plaintiff was appointed as C University established and operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant University”) as a photo, image, and special assistant professor, and was in office at the Defendant University.

B. Around June 2017, a student’s civil petition was filed with respect to the Plaintiff’s curriculum and partial remarks, etc., and the Defendant constituted a fact-finding committee to investigate the Plaintiff’s misconduct including civil petitions.

C. On December 5, 2017, the Defendant requested the teachers’ disciplinary committee to decide on a disciplinary action against the Plaintiff. On December 28, 2017, the teachers’ disciplinary committee held the committee on December 28, 2017 to deliberate and resolve the disciplinary action against the Plaintiff.

Although all members of the Defendant Teachers' Disciplinary Committee (D, E, F, G, and H) were present at the above Committee, the challenge against the Plaintiff’s F member was accepted, and the F Committee’s disciplinary action was conducted without attendance.

Voluntary change in class hours and unauthorized absence;

A. When a teacher in charge of lectures intends to change his/her lecture hours, he/she prepared a change in the time table in advance and submitted it to the school secretary with the confirmation of the principal’s appointment, and obtained the approval of the president, and the Plaintiff also conducted the above class by changing the class hours of “I” from 8:30 am to 11:20 am (i.e., 10 to 13 am, 4 hours) in the first semester of 2017 without submitting a change in the time table, and without permission from the president, the Plaintiff started the above class by changing the class hours of “I” from 8:30 am to 11:20 am (i.e., 0 to 20 am

(b) Where it is impossible for a teacher to teach due to health problems, he/she shall submit an application for suspension to the university administrative office, even on that day, and submit reinforcements after reinforcement thereafter;

However, without submitting a written application for the suspension of a lecture, the Plaintiff voluntarily completed the class and did not reinforce it on the grounds that the Plaintiff had been too low students in the class of “I” at the end of May 2017.

The above A. B. Violation of the duty of good faith of the Teachers and Staff Disciplinary Adjustment Regulations [Attachment 1] 1.

(b) neglect of duties;