Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, each of the defendants B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, as to the Defendants, this is against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C On July 9, 2009, the Busan District Court sentenced 2 years of suspended sentence to 8 months of imprisonment for a violation of the Trademark Act at the Busan District Court on July 17, 2009, which became final and conclusive on July 17, 2009. On September 22, 2011, the Defendant D was sentenced to 2 years of suspended sentence to 1 year of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Regulation of Temporary Receiving of Goods at the Busan District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 30,

No one shall exchange or arrange for exchange or repurchase of game money or data, such as game items, which are tangible or intangible results produced or acquired through the abnormal use of game products, or engage in business of purchasing such money or data.

1. Although Defendant A, B, and C, Defendant A, despite the fact that Defendant B automatically sold and collected game money, data, such as game items, etc. (hereinafter “game items”), such as the term “Oito program”, to Defendant B. In proposing a sales business, Defendant A requested the development of an Oto program on the condition that the limited amount of expenses would be reflected in the limited profits. Defendant B consented thereto, and Defendant B developed “Oitop” and “Yi”, which is the Nitop program, and transferred it to Defendant A in turn.

Defendant

A refers to a place or business establishment in which game items are produced and acquired in a large quantity by participating in online games in an abnormal manner by using an error program in the term work site from June 2008 to January 2009 in an influortel in an influortel in an abnormal manner.

Defendant C, an operator, sold approximately KRW 13,21,00,000,000,000 for the above Oral Program, and Defendant B, such as spats or spats, developed and sent a plaque and spat for Oral Program to Defendant A, Defendant A, who purchased Oral Program, directly installed it or sent it by e-mail to the workplace operator who purchased Oral Program.

(b).