logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.03.20 2014고단1035
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 7, 2007, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay interest of KRW 500,000 per month if he/she lends money to the victim, which he/she operates a credit business, at the victim’s house located in Gyeyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C apartment.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any particular income or property, and instead did not use the funds borrowed from the victim to any other person, and the Defendant was planning to borrow more than 0 million won from all owners, including E and F, while engaging in credit business at the time, to use the funds borrowed from the victim to repay the borrowed funds to all owners. However, such circumstances were concealed by the victim.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 30 million won from the victim to the Defendant’s Nonghyup Bank account on the same day.

2. On May 25, 2007, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would pay 2% interest per month if he/she lent money to the said victim by telephone.

However, the Defendant had no particular income or property, and most of the KRW 30 million previously borrowed from the victim was repaid by the Defendant while engaging in credit business. At the time, the Defendant was planned to use the money borrowed from the victim to repay the borrowed money to the previous owner, but the circumstances were concealed by the victim.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 40 million won from the victim to the Defendant’s Nonghyup Bank account on the same day.

3. On June 5, 2007, the Defendant made a false statement that the Defendant would pay 2% interest per month if he/she lent money to the said victim by telephone.

However, the defendant did not have any particular income or property, and most of the 70 million won borrowed from the victim is the defendant.

arrow