logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2017.08.31 2017가합5538
임대차목적물반환청구
Text

1. Defendant B:

(a) out of the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 list 369.86 square meters, and the above building and the above building.

Reasons

1. It is as shown in the ground of appeal No. 2 to the effect that the Plaintiff seeking the withdrawal from the real estate stated in the Disposition No. 1, which is the object of lease, and the delivery and payment of the unpaid rent on the real estate stated in the Disposition No. 2, on the ground that the lease contract has been terminated due to the Defendants’ delinquency in the lease of the real estate stated in the Disposition No. 1 and the real estate stated in the Disposition No.

2. According to Article 256(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, where the defendant contests the plaintiff's claim, he/she has a duty to submit a written answer within 30 days from the date of receiving a duplicate of the complaint.

Since the Defendants did not submit a written reply within 30 days after being served with the duplicate of the complaint of this case, the Defendants, pursuant to Article 257(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, shall be deemed to have led to the confession of the facts constituting the grounds for the claim, and the judgment shall be rendered without holding any pleadings, but only the matters necessary to specify the grounds for the claim in accordance with Article 208(3)1

arrow