The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended separately.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal submitted the new construction plan on October 31, 2014, and the original restoration plan on November 25, 2014, respectively, by Defendant A, upon receiving an order to submit each of the orders issued by the following markets, but the public official in charge of the Administration in the following cities refused to repair the plan without justifiable grounds.

Even if a public official in charge does not refuse repair without a justifiable reason, it is impossible to implement an order to submit materials because the sales contract concluded by the substitute-to-land method according to the end of the public official in charge of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the Ysan-si is not properly implemented.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that convicted the charged facts of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. 1) The Defendants asserted that the public official in charge refuses to accept the document without any justifiable reason and asserted that the reasons for appeal are identical to those for appeal in the lower court, and the lower court rejected the above assertion in detail by clearly explaining the judgment on the above argument in the 3th page No. 1 of the judgment.

Examining the above judgment of the court below after comparing it with records, the judgment of the court below is just, and there is an error of law by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

subsection (b) of this section.

2) In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged based on the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court that there is justifiable reason for failing to submit the materials, the Defendants’ assertion on this part is rejected, as it is sufficiently recognized that the Defendant did not submit the materials ordering the submission of the materials without justifiable grounds.

① The Defendants end up the sales contract between the Defendant’s social welfare foundation B (hereinafter “Defendant Foundation”) and the Defendant Company F.