logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.13 2016나29219
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the counterclaim in the judgment shall be modified as follows:

Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part is as follows, and this part of the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification or addition of some content as follows. As such, this part is cited in accordance

In Part III of the first instance judgment, “A. Dispute and the result thereof between the Plaintiff and the Defendant related to the instant building” is amended to “A. Dispute and the result thereof between F and the Defendant related to the instant building, and the result thereof.”

Part 4 of the judgment of the first instance court, “B. The ownership change between the Plaintiff and Defendant C with respect to the instant building” is amended to “B. The building of this case and the ownership change between F and the Defendants.”

Of the six pages of the judgment of the first instance court, “The following (3)” in subparagraph (5) shall be amended to “the table in (5) below.” Of the seven pages of the judgment of the first instance, “64,568,912 won” shall be “64,568,920 won”, and each Note 2 shall be amended to “64,568,912 won in the complaint of this case,” and each Note 2 shall be amended to “64,568,912 won in the complaint of this case, which shall be deemed to be a clerical error of KRW 64,568,920 in the scope of the Plaintiff’s assertion: Provided, That this shall be determined within the scope of the Plaintiff’s assertion.”

From January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014, annual rent of KRW 7,800 (value-added tax separate) shall be leased from F to F on December 27, 2013, and the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement to pay rent to F (6,301,840/year), Defendant C, A (1,498,160/year) separately according to the ownership ratio.

The evidence Nos. 1 through 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance (based on recognition) shall be amended as “Evidence Nos. 1 through 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance, Evidence No. 24 of the judgment,” and “Witness” as “Witness of the court of first instance”, respectively.

(b) the addition of the decision of the first instance court is 5 pages.

arrow