1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the real estate stated in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 4, 2013, the Plaintiff leased real estate listed in the attached list to the Defendant as KRW 29 million, monthly rent of KRW 195,00,00.

(b) The above lease contract;

6. Article 1(1) of the Special Conditions on Contracts provides that “The lessor may renew the lease contract on a two-year basis with the lessee who maintains the eligibility for occupancy of national rental housing (such as the constituent members of a house without a house, asset holding standard, income standard, requirements for restricting the scale of a house on a single-household basis).”

C. Meanwhile, on January 31, 2017, the Defendant completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the ground of sale on January 25, 2017, as to B forest land 6,600 square meters, C forest land 740 square meters, D land 8,244 square meters, E land for factory, 332 square meters, F forest land 262 square meters (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”).

The Plaintiff according to the Plaintiff’s asset holding standard amount exceeding the standard amount on June 15, 2017, according to the Plaintiff’s asset holding standard amount on or around June 30, 2017. In the case of a household whose renewed contract period after June 30, 2017, the asset holding standard amount is KRW 228 million in total assets.

In addition, the standard market value of real estate registered in the name of the plaintiff is 380,682,580 won.

On the other hand, it refused to renew the rental contract and demanded the defendant to leave the rental house from the rental house for the reason that the rental house is disqualified.

[Based on Recognition] 2-4, Gap evidence 3, 4, and 5 (including paper numbers)

2. According to the above facts finding as to the plaintiff's claim, the lease agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant between the plaintiff and the plaintiff is terminated due to the plaintiff's rejection of renewal due to the plaintiff's failure to meet the defendant's asset holding standard. Thus, the defendant

3. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. The defendant asserts that since each of the instant real estate was trusted by Nonparty G, each of the instant real estate was not owned by the defendant.

And Eul 3, 5.