Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, with respect to Defendant B, the period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a director of the general headquarters in Yong-Nam area E, and Defendant B is the president of the branch office in the above company, who is engaged in selling medical devices of the above company.

No person shall make a false or exaggerated advertisement on the name, manufacturing method, performance, efficacy, effect, or mechanism of a medical device in connection with an advertisement of a medical device.

Nevertheless, the Defendants jointly show the following: (a) at the public relations center of the above company border point located in Busan City from November 2014 to October 2015, the Defendants: (b) at the public relations center of the above company border; (c) Defendant A, a heat medical device sold by the public relations center to unspecified older persons visiting the public relations center, to have the public relations center gain access to the relevant company, so as to do so; and (d) before and after mixing, before and after mixing with the heat at a hole, and from time to time, they show the following photographs, etc. attached thereto; and (e) from time to time, “the use of the warm heat and the high quality system is improved by preventing cancer; and (e) G las treatment cells activation cells are activated; and (e) sexual dypopic diseases, such as high-tension and cerebral pressure, etc., are activated by promoting high-tension and high-tension, etc. by promoting divers within the cells of cell cells.

Defendant B, while staying in the above place, has been prevented cancer when using the hot heat and the highest quality body for unspecified elderly people over several times, and has improved the multi-faceted disease, such as urology, blood pressure, and disks, and G racer treatment is improved with high blood pressure, cerebral chrossis, etc.

The term "the" was demoted.

As a result, the Defendants jointly advertised the efficacy, effect, or principle of medical devices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to H, I, and J;

1. Each statement of H and K;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Detailed statement of transactions;

1. A license to manufacture a medical device;

1. Each investigation report (a.g., attaching outputs of seized articles related to the suspicion of exaggerated advertisement, such as medical appliances, and seized articles A.