logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.27 2015노4384
강제추행
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) and the victim E (hereinafter “victim”).

No indecent act was committed.

2. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the judgment of the court below and the evidence examined by the appellate court, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim as shown in the facts charged.

① At the time of the instant case, the victim resisted the Defendant immediately after the victim committed an indecent act against the Defendant at the first time, and reported the fact of damage to the police.

The victim said that the court below made a concrete and consistent decision based on a clear memory about the details and contents of the damage as a witness and the situation reported to the police.

Although the mother of the injured party after the crime is recognized the fact that the injured party has met the defendant, the circumstances where the injured party requested unreasonable or unreasonable requests beyond the scope of legitimate discussions on death and agreement are not found.

The statements of the victim may be trusted.

(2) The defendant and defense counsel together with a club at the time of the instant case in an appellate trial to impeachment the victim’s horses.

G and H have been applied for as a witness, and the gist of their testimony is as follows:

(1) The witness G was Defendant 1 on the next table that he saw 4 and her club.

“A structure with a height to a certain extent between the table table” and “the table for Defendant’s driving was not well visible.

“Before self-determination, there was three-hours in the club.”

The club entered the first club and divided the defendant's daily activities and personnel, and the remaining, except for the case of giving and taking the drinking by the table, was play as witness.

"A club has been naturally set up without any person who is or was naturally set up because it was in a separate position from Defendant's daily activity."

The following day was known to the Defendant that there was no victim in the club, and that there was no victim in the club, and that there was no victim in the defendant.

“.......”

(B) H is a man who is included in the Defendant and the witness on the day of this case.

arrow