1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 2,500,000 for each of the Plaintiffs and their respective years from February 26, 2014 to March 31, 2016.

Basic Facts

A. Defendant Incorporated Foundation D (hereinafter “Defendant Incorporated”) is the owner of approximately 30,000 F forest land in the Hanam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun (hereinafter “instant forest”) and created a park cemetery in the instant forest. Defendant E is the manager of the Defendant Incorporated Foundation, who is in charge of the creation of the said park cemetery.

B. In the initial forest land of this case, approximately 38 graves were installed, and the Defendant corporation, upon agreement with the relative about about about 30 of them, moved to this Chapter. Defendant E, around November 2013, became aware that two of the remaining eight of the eight of them were G and the Plaintiff’s parents H and deceased I graves.

(hereinafter the above two graves are referred to as “instant grave”). C.

Defendant E, by having known and contacted G’s contact address around that time, did not agree on the compensation for relocation while negotiating the issue of the removal of G and the instant grave. Defendant E, as if the instant grave were frighten and buried, intended to arbitrarily open the grave. On February 18, 2014, by hiding the fact that contact with G, who is the relative of the instant grave, was contacted with G, and obtained permission for the reburial of the instant grave from the J-Myeon head on February 26, 2014, and then buried the instant grave and buried the remains, and then buried the remains in the Gain Park, which is located in the Ha-gun granting of Chungcheongnam-gun without the consent of G and the Plaintiffs.

On April 10, 2015, Defendant E was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of 8 months for the crime of excavating a grave in the Daejeon District Court Branch of the Daejeon District Court on April 10, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 18, 2015.

(The Daejeon District Court 2014 Highest 410). E.

G, South Korea, and the plaintiffs, are children of the network H and the network I.

[Reasons for Recognition] Fact-finding, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and the ground for a claim for determination of the purport of the entire pleadings, the court below acknowledged the above facts as follows. Although the person who was discharged from the grave of this case is G, who is the head of the deceased, and the plaintiffs are not Jeju, the plaintiffs, but the graves of this case.