logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.01.20 2016고단2142
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 18, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for the crime of damage to public goods in the support for the installation of a water source method, and completed the execution of the sentence on June 13, 2015.

1. On August 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) demanded the opening of a cell phone by entering the “E” operated by the victim D, which was located in Seocheon-si, Seoul shopping mall 240 on August 10, 2016; (b) however, the Defendant demanded the opening of a cell phone, but the victim did not have much for the period of opening the cell phone currently used; and (c) there is

“Along with the need to refuse and return home on a regular basis, the Defendant continued to demand the opening of the mobile phone, and the Defendant is in large voice as to who is in the military.

For the people, funeral services are unconditioned and called.

Cr reported to the police.

There is a person who can resolve the failure of happiness.

It is prohibited that no funeral service will be provided.

“Along 30 minutes of time,” etc., the victim’s cell phone sales business was obstructed by force, such as preventing customers who left the cell phone border by leaving the cell phone, from entering the store.

2. The Defendant continued to damage property at the same date and time as paragraph 1, and at the same place as that of paragraph 1, the Defendant reported to the police without causing damage to the opening of the cell phone, and attempted to drive his/her cell phone. However, the Defendant: (a) carried the store display stand, which is owned by the victim D, and carried the store display stand in a hand-time with three knife, and (b) destroyed the above store display stand and three knife board in an amount equivalent to KRW 500,000,000,000 in the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement at the sixth public trial date in court;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A written statement;

1. Type of crime and photographs of damaged objects;

1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, personal acceptance status, and application of judgment-making statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 15 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with labor for the crime.

arrow