1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

Plaintiff

The plaintiff's successor's claims are all made.

1. The scope of the judgment in this Court is examined in the first instance court as to the Defendant, and the Plaintiff’s claim based on the cause of the claim, such as the examination in the following Section 4. A. (1) (hereinafter “instant claim”).

Based on the judgment of the court of first instance, the plaintiff's succeeding intervenor Gap succeeded to the principal lawsuit on the ground that part of the claim in this case was ordered by the plaintiff's succeeding intervenor Eul on the ground that part of the claim in this case while the lawsuit was pending, and the plaintiff succeeded to the principal lawsuit on the ground that the plaintiff's succeeding intervenor Eul was ordered to acquire the claim in this case, and the intervenor filed an application for intervention of the independent party on the ground that the plaintiff's succeeding intervenor was entitled to an assignment order or assignment of the claim in this case. The judgment of the court of first instance dismissed all the claims of the plaintiff, succeeding intervenors and intervenors. The plaintiff's succeeding intervenor appealed appealed only and the intervenor filed an appeal on the ground that the plaintiff did not comply with the order of correction, but the presiding judge of the court of first instance dismissed the petition of appeal on the ground that the plaintiff's succeeding intervenor did not comply with the purport of the appeal by the plaintiff. However, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and thus, it is necessary to conclude that the plaintiff's succeeding intervenor's claim in this case and the plaintiff's succeeding 20.