A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 9, 2012, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) from the Gwangju District Court's Netcheon Branch on July 9, 2012, and a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine in the same court on January 18, 2012, respectively.

around 22:50 on January 12, 2017, the Defendant, who violated the provision prohibiting driving of alcohol twice or more, driven B K3 motor vehicles under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.071% alcohol concentration at a section of about 200 meters from the main body of the “Oren-gu, Oren-gu,” which is “Oren-gu, Oren-dong,” in the direction of the “Oren-dong,” to the front side of the said capital apartment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Previous convictions: References to the results of crackdown on driving alcohol, references to inquiries, such as criminal history, and application of each summary order text;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) and the main sentence of Article 62-2(2) of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. of Social Service Order and Order to Attend a lecture shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the factors of sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age and environment, and the Defendant’s age, drinking alcohol concentration, drinking distance, previous conviction, and time interval between the instant crime and the instant crime, which are favorable to the Defendant, including the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime, even though having the same criminal history twice.