1. The Defendants, the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties, H, I, J, K, L, and M shall be attached to the Plaintiff, among the 619 square meters m2 in Singju City.

1. Facts of recognition;

A.O, P, Q, and R completed the registration of ownership transfer on January 9, 1950 with respect to each/4 share of N 619 square meters in Innju City (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. On September 15, 1975, the Plaintiff completed a move-in report with a house on the ground of the instant land, and from that time, the Plaintiff occupied the instant land while residing in the instant house from that time to that of the closing date of the argument

The above house is unregistered building, and the plaintiff is the owner in the building ledger.

C. On November 28, 2012, theO donated 1/4 shares out of the instant land to ASEAN, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on December 4, 2012.

Defendant B is the heir of P, and Defendant C, D, E, and F are the inheritors of Q, and Defendant (Appointed Party) and the heir of R, I, J, K, L, and M are the successors of R.

The inheritance shares of the Defendants, the Defendants (Appointeds) and the designated parties are as shown in the attached Table.

E. On July 20, 2017, the first conciliation date of the instant case was concluded between the Plaintiff and S, and Q (the heir of Q, Defendant C, D, E, and F) that “S and T shall implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration for each of the pertinent shares of the instant land to the Plaintiff on September 1, 1995.”

F. The Plaintiff paid the instant land property tax imposed on R from the commencement of the occupation of the instant land until the time of 2016.

[Based on recognition] For Defendant C, D, E, and F: Confession of confession (Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act): The fact that there is no dispute against Defendant B and the Defendant (Appointed Party): each entry of Party A’s evidence Nos. 1 through 9 (including branch numbers), U’s testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff occupied the land of this case from September 1, 1975 to 20 years, and such Plaintiff’s.