The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Around 04:15 on April 28, 2015, the Defendant was boarding a taxi driven by the victim C (the age of 69) as a guest, left the taxi in the presence of the agricultural cooperative located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and let the victim go to the house of the Defendant who is in the seat of the Defendant.

However, since the defendant did not enter the house, the victim was frighter, out of the victim, and the defendant frightened the frighten of the victim, and frighted the victim's frighten, and frighted the victim's frighten to a large way, and assaulted the victim by drinking twice.

However, the above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim can be acknowledged as the fact that he/she withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant on September 9, 2015, which is after the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.