A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 9, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant, on November 22, 2017, at the 1112th underground parking lot C, Osan-si, through the 112thm, to stop the Defendant who was at the entrance of the parking lot, the slope E and the police box belonging to the police box affiliated with the Modong Police Station D, which called the Defendant, leading the Defendant to E, leading him to go on the left face of E by hand, and pushed his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 reporting management work.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of photographs, CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] Interference with the Execution of Official Duties of Type 1 (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties and Compelling of Duties) (6 months to 1 year and 6 months)] There is no basic area (a person in charge of special sentencing] [decision of sentencing] [a person in charge of official duties] [a person in charge of a police officer who assaults a police officer who conducts official duties and the nature of the crime is not good; a defendant is in contravention of the confession of the crime in this case; and there is