Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 4, 2015, the Defendant got to turn to the left by driving B cargo vehicles at the north-west Eup from the north-west side to the north-west Eup at the intersection where the Namyang-ri located in Namyang-gu, Namyang-do.

In order to proceed to this place by a private-distance intersection with a signal apparatus installed and operated normally, the person has the duty of care to check the signal apparatus's signals and to prevent the accident from spreading along the signal apparatus's signals.

Nevertheless, despite the fact that the defendant was in a two-lane, he proceeded to the left-hand turn in violation of the signal while driving in a two-lane, and led to a conflict between the two-lanes of the opposite side and the front left-hand part of the victim C's D's D's D's D's D's D's D's D's D's driving.

Thus, the Defendant sustained injury to the injured party C, such as damage to scam water, etc. between drillings requiring treatment for about six months, and injury to the injured party E who was on board the injured party C driver's vehicle for about four weeks, such as scambling, closing, etc., which requires treatment for about four weeks, and injury to the injured party F, which requires treatment for about two weeks to the injured party F, and injury to the injured party G, requiring treatment for about 16 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Provisional Payment Order was agreed with the victim C among the victims, but the above victim suffered significant damage due to the injury requiring treatment for six months and many victims are determined by taking account of the fact that there are many victims.