logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2013.05.23 2013고단152
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On March 21, 1994, at around 01:59 on March 21, 1994, the Defendant, as the owner of A truck, violated the restriction on operation by loading a cargo of at least 11.3 tons on the 2 axis and operating the said vehicle in excess of 11.3 tons on the street at a point of 119 kilometers in front of the running line of the Honam Expressway.

2. The judgment prosecutor applied Article 86 and Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995); and the sentence of a fine of 300,000 won was finalized by a summary order No. 94, Sept. 28, 1994; however, Article 86 of the above Act provides that "where an agent, employee, or other employee of a corporation commits a violation under subparagraph 1 of Article 84 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the corresponding Article shall also be imposed on the corporation, as well, shall be imposed on the corporation." This part of the Constitutional Court Order No. 2011Hun-Ga24, Dec. 29, 2011, which affected the retroactive effect.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow