Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving a rocketing taxi.

On February 23, 2017, around 04:17, the Defendant was driving the said taxi in one lane between the two lanes in the upper water basin and the two lanes in the upper water basin. The Defendant was driving the said taxi along the three lanes in the upper water basin, while making the internship.

Since there is a center line of yellow solid lines, in such a case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to make a U.S. internship at the permissible point of practice.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and hered the center line at a place other than the permitted point for U-turns and hereded the front part of the FOF driving of the victim E (32 tax) who was going on the opposite line and hered on the right side of the said taxi.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer injury, such as a cage of 8 cage cages, which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant Act and the Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the Defendant, with the central line at a place other than the place where the internship is permitted, caused the instant accident by negligence, and that the victim suffered relatively serious injury due to the instant accident, and that the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim is disadvantageous.

However, the sentencing conditions stipulated by Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the fact that the Defendant is against the instant crime, the fact that the taxi operated by the Defendant is subscribed to the Financial Cooperative, the Defendant is not subject to punishment exceeding the fine due to the same kind of crime, and the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive for the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.