logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.07.25 2014고단1110
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 110] The Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on December 18, 2013 by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint confinement) in the same court on December 10, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 18, 2013, and is currently under suspension of execution.

From September 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) leased the victim C’s second floor and resided together with the person in de facto marriage (n, 45 years of age). On March 20, 2014, the Defendant tried to comply with the reason that E did not receive a low call from the above residence at around 20:00, but, on the ground that E does not open a door to visit, the Defendant took a bath for the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's visit to the extent of repair costs.

[2014 Highest 1158] On March 7, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed that he was under the influence of alcohol in front of the KT telephone station located in the Dong-dong, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City on March 7, 2014; (b) he was demanded by the above F to re-enter him to return home from a slope belonging to the G District of the Daejeon Eastern Police Station, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City Mayor, upon receipt of a 112 report that he was under the influence of alcohol in front of the 35-15 Dong-dong, and that he was under the influence of alcohol; and (c) he was required by the police officer again to return home from a slope belonging to the G District of the Daejeon Special Metropolitan City, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City, the head of which was flick; (d) he continued to take off his breast while he was under the influence of h's breast and she was under the influence of h's chest; and (e) he was under the influence of his chest.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on crime prevention and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of police statement of E and H;

1. Each photograph;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the investigative report (verification of the facts during the period of suspension of execution of sentence).

arrow