logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2017.12.20 2016고단433
상해
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: (a) the Defendant, on the front side of the D container in Johcho-si, early July 2, 2016, expressed a desire to the part of the victim E (n't, 58 years old) and took the part of the victim E (n't, e.g., getting the victim to walk; and (b) the victim was able to walk.

Tners once a waveist shall be divate.

I would like to drink if you drink.

“The Defendant was in accordance with “,” and the Defendant died of the victim on the ground that the Defendant was in harmony.

“In doing so, at the Defendant’s lush, the part of the victim’s neck was boomed twice by the Defendant’s lusent hand, and the part was bucked to the part of the victim’s neck, where the victim’s neck was pushed down, and the part was bucked to the victim’s right by drinking and bucking with the Defendant’s drinking and bucking part of the victim’s right. In doing so, the victim was injured by assaulting the victim, i.e., taking the part of the victim’s bucks that need to be treated for about 16 weeks.

2. In full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone proves that the Defendant inflicted an injury by assaulting the victim as stated in the facts charged is beyond reasonable doubt.

and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

A. The Defendant asserts that “the victim was forced to have a dispute with the victim due to his/her mouth, and the victim was deprived of, and went back to, his/her center in the process of causing the victim to have his/her breast-learning strings, and thereafter, reported to 119 to appeal to the part of the bridge.” However, except for the changes in the statement as to whether the victim was pushed about the part of the victim in the course of his/her movement with the victim, it is consistent with the overall contents from the investigative agency to this court, and there is no special contradiction.

In addition, immediately after the case.

arrow