(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.06.29 2016고정141

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.06.29 2016고정141

상해

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant was the pro-born of the victim D, who is both South and North Korea. The Defendant and the victim were in dispute over the issue of support, pension, etc. of the mother.

On July 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 14:36 on July 22, 2015, on the road in front of the F cafeteria located in Busan Southern-gu, the Defendant laid the front side of the victim and asked where his mother is the mother; (b) on the left side of the victim, the Defendant 5-6 parts of the face, the chest, and the arms are in need of approximately two weeks medical treatment for the victim.

2. Determination

A. The complainant stated in an investigative agency or a court to the effect that “the Defendant was frighting on the road of the Defendant, and the Defendant was frighting on the road, and his mother’s whereabouts, and thus, the Defendant was frighting on his own arms without any circumstances, or because her mother’s whereabouts were changed, the Defendant was frighting on the right side and her chested on his own arms, thereby making a statement at the investigative agency or court.”

B. As to this, the Defendant was left on the right side of the Defendant, and the complainant was trying to leave on the left side, and the complainant was about to leave the left side, and the complainant and her mother were Da and her mother.

“In doing so, I testified to the effect that she was out of the spot and was only out of the spot.”

(c)

Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence examined by the court, it is difficult to recognize the facts charged only with the statement of the complainant (defluence of trust), the certificate of injury diagnosis, and the report of investigation (Attachment to a photograph of the suspect and the complainant), and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

(1) CCTV for crime prevention (i.e., g., 14:36 to one minute video) is recorded on a fluor's front side of the defendant walking a match route by the complainant, and a fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluoral surface

This is that the complainant continues to be the defendant.

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2017.04.27 2016노2687

-수원지방법원 2020.12.17 2020노4734

-의정부지방법원 2011.8.12.선고 2010고합339 판결

-인천지방법원 2013.04.26 2012노2227

-의정부지방법원 2020.10.29 2019노2530