A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the victim C (V, 44 years old) and the legal couple's death.

On June 4, 2016, on the ground that the injured party was not from time to time the Defendant’s telephone, the Defendant laid down the victim’s hair by breabbing the breath’s breath, and then laid down the victim’s head in the floor. On the part of the victim’s head, which is a dangerous object located far away from the breath, the Defendant took up the victim’s head one time by making the victim’s head head fat, and fele’s boom by making the victim’s face 25 days in both hand, and then, the Defendant took up two open fat, which requires treatment for about 25 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Each police statement with respect to C and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to medical records;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following grounds for sentencing)

1. The defendant's and defense counsel's arguments that there is no fact that the victim was at the time of the defendant's and defense counsel's assistance.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by this court in addition to the overall purport of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, i.e., the witness of the defendant at the time to commit the crime, F, a witness of the defendant, consistently sought from an investigative agency to this court.

The statement, ② the victim also made his head at the time of the police investigation.

In full view of the facts stated in the Defendant’s criminal facts, the Defendant committed an injury upon the victim’s head’s care angle, which is a dangerous object, such as the victim’s statement.

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and his defense counsel is without merit.

The reason for sentencing is that there is no sentencing guidelines.

The risk of the instant crime is the same.