The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Summary of the facts charged in this case

A. Around November 19:20 on November 5, 2012, the Defendant, at the front day of Seongdong-gu Seoul Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C apartment, expressed that the victim D (Nam and 58 years of age) attempted to make an illegal internship and would have a conflict with the Ortoba that he/she drives.

For reasons, there is a dispute.

A feled off the wall, and assaulted the victim's face in several times.

B. The Defendant damaged property at the time, time, and place of the foregoing assault, thereby causing approximately KRW 35,00 of the repair cost to go far away from the bridge worn by the victim.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that D, the victim stated in the facts charged, from the investigative agency to the court, only her obsess were taken in the course of demanding compensation for the defendant's her dives due to his her dives, and did not assault D or destroy her safety.

In this case, D's statements and E's statements are made as evidence corresponding to the facts charged in this case.

First, with respect to D’s statement, D stated to the effect that it was acknowledged that the Defendant was an illegal intern at the left turn, but D demanded D’s own loan of an illegal U.S., and that D’s face was not paid due to D’s failure to pay D’s face, and the Defendant stated to the effect that “business taxi was able to borrow money from a traffic accident during the past, including “the 100,000 won- or KRW 10,000 or KRW 10,000,000 or KRW 10,000, or 200.”

그러나 기록에 의하면, D은 택시를 운행하다가 편도2차선 도로에서 양방향 직진신호임에도 불구하고 불법유턴을 하였고(이 사건 장소에는 D의 진술과는 달리 좌회전신호가 없으므로 위 진술은 명백히 거짓으로 판단된다), 당시 피고인이 반대방향에서 전조등을 켠 채 정상신호를 따라 오토바이를...