logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.10.19 2012고단3821
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a route bus.

On July 17, 2012, the Defendant driving the above vehicle at around 19:35 on the 19:35th day of 2012, and driving the education development institute distance located in Yang Jae-dong Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul at the time of the accident at the speed of speed in the speed of the speed of the city at the speed of the five-lanes in the direction of the two-lanes in the forest protection area of Yang Jae-gu. Since the location is a place where traffic is controlled by signal apparatus, even though there was a duty of care to drive the vehicle under the new subparagraph, the Defendant is driving at the same direction two-lane in the same direction as the Defendant, by negligence as the Defendant, by failing to observe the signal and enter the intersection, even though the signal apparatus was changed to the red stop signal in the front line of entry

In accordance with the right turn at the intersection, the victim D(32 years of age) driven by the victim D(C) who was left left at the right right turn in the direction of the left turn, suffered injury such as abandonment, pulverization and pulverization of the left-side side of the driver's vehicle, due to the shock of the part above the right side of the driver's vehicle for about nine weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow