Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) of the original judgment (7 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

It is reasonable to take into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant led to the instant crime and reflects his mistake; and (b) the Defendant appears to be aged and have inconvenience.

However, the crime of this case is a situation unfavorable to the defendant, such as the fact that it is not good that the defendant acquired money of a considerable amount through fraud through several times after having a close relationship with the victim while using the name of the defendant, and that the amount of damage has not been repaid, and that the defendant has a record of being punished several times for the same crime.

In this context, the scope of the recommended sentence with respect to the instant crime according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court is from 6 months to 16 months, from 1.6 months, from 1.6 months, from 1.6 months to 1.6 months, from 1.1 years to 1.6 years, from 2.1 years to 3.0 years, from 1.2 years to 1.1 years, the recommended sentence scope (basic field), and the recommended sentence scope (6 months to 1.6 months), and other various sentencing conditions, such as Defendant age, character and character, environment, circumstances of the instant crime, conditions before

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.